FIRST AMENDMENT PETITION FOR REDRESS OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY FEDERAL AND STATE GOVERNMENTS AND MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENTS
Pursuant to Article I, Article II, Article III, Article IV, Article V, Article VI, and the First, Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution for the United States of America, the undersigned, as citizens of the United States, residents of the State of Virginia, and residents of the County of Loudoun within the State of Virginia, hereby exercise our constitutionally protected “right” to petition our government (i.e. County Commissioners) for redress of violations of the Constitution for the United States of America.
WHEREAS, on three separate occasions Presidents Madison (1817), Monroe (1822) and Jackson (1830) vetoed efforts by Congress to create a Department of Transportation on the grounds that these powers were not enumerated in Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution. The reason given by President Madison was “That the power they were attempting to establish within the Bill was not an enumerated power within the Constitution”. President Monroe stated “This power can be granted only by an amendment to the Constitution and in the mode prescribed by it.” President Jackson who was America’s first Democratic President supported Madison and Monroe by saying. “If it be the wish of the people that the construction of roads and canals should be conducted by the Federal Government, it is not only highly expedient, but indispensably necessary, that a previous amendment of the Constitution, delegating the necessary power and defining and restricting its exercise with reference to the sovereignty of the States, should be made.” Congress passed a bill signed by President Johnson in 1966 that was and is unconstitutional to this day as no Constitutional amendment permitting it’s formation has been ratified.
WHEREAS, the Department of Health Education and Welfare was formed in 1953 by President Eisenhower without authorization by Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution. Nowhere in the Constitution is the general government provided regulatory power to make rules regarding medicine, schooling or public assistance. The Virginia Resolution of 1798 exercised power given to the states through Article VII and the 10th Amendment of the Constitution identifying the Alien & Sedition Acts as unenumerated under Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution and stating the following: “That this Assembly doth explicitly and peremptorily declare, that it views the powers of the federal government, as resulting from the compact, to which the states are parties; as limited by the plain sense and intention of the instrument constituting the compact; as no further valid that they are authorized by the grants enumerated in that compact; and that in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers, not granted by the said compact, the states who are parties thereto, have the right, and are in duty bound, to interpose for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining within their respective limits, the authorities, rights and liberties appertaining to them.”
WHEREAS, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was formed in 1970 by President Nixon without authorization from Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution and was created to impose unconstitutional regulations and unlawful taxation on the people and the states who are the parties of the Constitution according to it’s Article VII. The Constitution does not permit the general government to involve itself with regulating air, water and soil without the Constitutional amendment process outlined in Article V of the Constitution. The Kentucky Resolution of 1798 mirrored a similar condemnation as put forth by Virginia regarding the Alien & Sedition Acts thereby deeming them unconstitutional: “That this commonwealth does upon the most deliberate reconsideration declare, that the said alien and sedition laws, are in their opinion, palpable violations of the said constitution; and however cheerfully it may be disposed to surrender its opinion to a majority of its sister states in matters of ordinary or doubtful policy; yet, in momentous regulations like the present, which so vitally wound the best rights of the citizen, it would consider a silent acquiesecence as highly criminal:
WHEREAS, the Constitution for the United States as defined by proponents of the Constitution during the Ratification Debates clearly asserted that the Constitution was an enumerated Constitution not a general Constitution; the States delegated specific roles, responsibilities, powers, and property to the general government to exercise and possess. During the Virginia Ratification Debates George Marshall said the following: “Can they (Congress) go beyond the delegated powers? If they were to make a law not warranted by any of the powers enumerated, it would be considered by the judges as an infringement of the Constitution which they are to guard. They would not consider such a law as coming under their jurisdiction. They would declare it void.”
WHEREAS, the jurisdiction also defined in the Virginia Ratification Debates on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution were succinctly asserted by James Madison that “the powers of the federal government are enumerated; it can only operate in certain cases; it has legislative powers on defined and limited 2 objects, beyond which it cannot extend its jurisdiction,”1 (Mr. Madison, June 6 1787), and similarly the states are limited in powers granted to them by individual sovereignty granted by the First, Fourth, Fifth and Tenth Amendments.
WHEREAS, the rights of the individual are pre-eminent to a free society. Thomas Jefferson said the following when debating banks being allowed to incorporate: “I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground that “all powers not delegated to the US by the Constitution, not prohibited to it by the states, are reserved to the states or to the people’ (Tenth Amendment). To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specifically drawn around the powers of the Congress, is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of any definition.”
WHEREAS, the Tenth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee that governments cannot deprive any person of life, liberty or property and all people have the Right to equal protection of sacred rights and privileges from the US Constitution which Article IV decrees may not be abridged by any other federal, state or county law Congress, the President, State Legislatures, Governmental Agencies or Departments shall make no law or executive order that impedes the Individual’s rights to informed consent nor right to medical choice nor freedom of medical choice. Nor shall the President, Congress, State Legislatures, Governmental Agencies or Departments make any law or executive order that impedes the Individual’s right to medical privacy and freedom without individual and specific judicial warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual’s condition and danger it presents.”
WHEREAS, the Federal and state governments have taken the role of medical experts in the sweeping arena of personal health by usurping the power and authority given to the Individual. It is the individual alone who possesses the inalienable right to secure their Health in the manner they choose. Most importantly this includes informed consent by an Individual.
WHEREAS, the President, Congress and State Legislators with the aid of Governmental Agencies have enforced medical slavery upon the citizens of the United States of America by taking away the rights to medical freedom and freedom of medical choice which also is a hallowed relationship between an Individual and their physician or Health Care Provider. They have also denied informed consent to the millions who have received experimental medicines.
This usurpation of these inalienable rights cannot be tolerated by the Individual as well as many Physicians or Health Care Providers. This places the Individual in undue and unconstitutional harm’s way and has resulted in undue harm to many.
WHEREAS, this action has also taken away the medical privacy of the Individual which is a personal right that should not be abrogated except by proper individual and specific Court warrant supported by Oath and affirmation of necessary cause to protect Society from Harm describing the Individual’s condition and danger it presents.
Respectfully submitted this ______ day of ___________________ , 20__ by: